Ed Avis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > shouldn't the configure script have a 'checking for gettext' stage?
When you check source out directly from CVS, you're assumed to be an expert, and to have the correct build tools even if they're not on the standard list of tools all users are assumed to have. (The set of "expert" tools includes CVS itself. :-) The "checking for" stuff is designed more for non-experts, who are assumed to have tarballs instead of checking things out directly from CVS. It would be nice if it'd be easier to get things directly from CVS and that is on my list of things to help out with. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
