Scott Weikart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd be happy to re-submit my patch with a new 'conv' option for the > new behavior. We could call the new 'conv' option something like > > syncout > syncoutlast > synclast
Sounds good. I'd suggest 'osync' since the dd style seems to be a prefix 'o' for output options. I also suggest starting with the CVS sources <http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/coreutils>. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
