Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > did you find a system on which the existing code misbehaved?
Not personally, but I vaguely recall hearing of one. I just Googled for this and found James Kanze's 1997 reports here: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=m3afpggtwo.fsf%40gabi-soft.fr http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=m3iv41k6gh.fsf%40gabi-soft.fr That ancient (and unnamed) host implemented strchr (s, c) as the equivalent of memchr (s, c, strlen (s) + 1), which is allowed by the standard. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
