Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What do you think is unclear about this sentence? > > That is, an omitted INCREMENT defaults to 1 even when LAST is smaller > than FIRST.
Okay, that's clear; I do not knwo why I missed it. Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Thanks for clarification. > That was fixed in CVS a few months ago. Oops, sorry for bothering you -- obviously I've had a bad day ;-( _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
