Good. I'm letting the list know, too. "David Favro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 00:19:12 +0200, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Thanks for the report.
BTW, Tim, here's a link to it: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.core-utils.bugs/2459 >> Would you please see if you can reproduce the problem >> using ls built from these unmodified sources? >> >> ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/coreutils/coreutils-5.2.1.tar.gz >> ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/coreutils/coreutils-5.2.1.tar.bz2 >> >> I'm pretty sure the version that comes with RH/Fedora includes >> significant patches. > > You are right, that fixed it. I hadn't tried building it since > Fedora's version number matched the latest from your source, and it > seems unusual for an O/S distribution to make mods to such a > "generic" utility. I guess I'll report it to Fedora. Thanks again. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
