On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I thought this was interesting... >http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/jbeck/20041001#rm_rf_protection
I'd struggle to find a justification for removing / (perhaps some chroot'd scenario), but surely this kind of protection mechanism belongs in the [interactive] shell, a la tcsh's "rmstar" builtin. Cheers, Phil _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
