On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:47:52AM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote: > OK, thanks for explaining it. Can you please try the following patch > instead? It tries to do the right thing in that case. It also checks > for bogus signal numbers (i.e., nonpositive ones). I don't have a bad > utmp file to test with, so I'd appreciate it if you'd try it out > on your bad file before I document and install this change.
Yes, this works very well. Thanks! Tim. */
pgphAjZFZs7Bx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
