Robert Castelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > if i followed this right, xmemcoll is called at line 1536 of sort.c > which calls memcoll at line 45 of xmemcoll.c which calls strcoll at line > 47 of memcoll.c.
I assume we're talking about coreutils 5.2.1 here? I don't remember. Two things. First, your debugging information is confusing. Can you please rebuild with CFLAGS='-g', so that optimization doesn't cause debugging anomalies? (If this fixes the problem then we need to look elsewhere for the bug.) Then please redo your analysis. We need to find out exactly what was passed to strcoll, and what value it returned (I suspect 0), and what errno was set to afterwards, and what memcoll did afterwards. Second, can you please try coreutils 5.3.0 instead? ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/coreutils/coreutils-5.3.0.tar.gz Thanks. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
