Guillaume Chazarain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: >>If there is no better way to solve the problem, then I'd consider >>leaving the code the way it is. >> > Don't forget, there is my workaround, it stills cause gettext() calls in > the signal handler, but I cannot make it fail, unlike vanilla.
Thanks. I remember :) Your patch is definitely better from the perspective of keeping the code maintainable, but it'd be good to know why it works. Maybe because once initialized, gettext is far less likely to call functions like mmap and malloc? Can you determine whether (with your patch) e.g., malloc is ever being called from the signal handler? _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
