Mark Brand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>The problem had nothing to do with '-h'. >>> >> >>It has. >> >>Andreas. >> >> > The info included with the patch seemed to imply that you would have to > use the "-h" option to experience the problem, which is not the case. > > Perhaps your point is that the problem was caused by something in the > code related to the "-h" option. Would you care to explain?
The code to handle -h (and its inverse) was incorrectly overriding recursive operations. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstra�e 5, 90409 N�rnberg, Germany Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
