On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 11:43:46PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > A couple of dumb questions. What does BSD's df -i output look like? > And would it make sense simply to modify coreutils to match BSD's > behavior, particularly if the BSD behavior is more useful? Fyi: on FreeBSD -current:
lizzy:~% uname -a FreeBSD lizzy.catnook.local 6.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT #7: Tue Jun 21 00:41:15 PDT 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LIZZY i386 lizzy:~% df -i Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused Mounted on /dev/da2s2a 253678 100876 132508 43% 2899 30123 9% / devfs 1 1 0 100% 0 0 100% /dev /dev/da2s2d 253678 93054 140330 40% 3283 29739 10% /var /dev/da2s2f 6824094 2800544 3477624 45% 161158 733816 18% /usr /dev/md0 63214 2638 55520 5% 316 8130 4% /tmp /dev/da1s1d 34710178 6225418 25707946 19% 166408 4332022 4% /home /dev/da0s3d 6560308 5249434 786050 87% 76128 795294 9% /home.bak procfs 4 4 0 100% 1 0 100% /proc linprocfs 4 4 0 100% 1 0 100% /usr/compat/linux/proc fdescfs 1 1 0 100% 4 9162 0% /dev/fd lizzy:~% > (I presume that coreutils is mimicking BSD's old behavior here, and > BSD changed.) -- Jos Backus jos at catnook.com _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
