Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Blake) writes: >> Would it make more sense to have a single sha utility > > That's just what I was about to suggest, except why not unify all the > coreutils checksumming utilities?
I can see the appeal, but I like the ``one task, one tool'' philosophy, too. How about if we provide separate binaries for now, and then if someone contributes a general, umbrella-style checksumming tool, we can simply add that too? _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
