Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As you can imagine, I find the POSIX-required behavior to be senseless.
Two things.
First, I recall that you preferred the non-POSIX behavior because of
file name completion issues. But because we agitated about this a
while ago, Bash now does a better job with file name completion. For
example, given this:
mkdir dir
ln -s dir symlink
If I type "mv sym[TAB]", where [TAB] stands for a tab character, the
screen then looks like this:
mv symlink
If I type another [TAB] it then looks like this:
mv symlink/
so I'm given a signal from Bash that I have a symlink to a directory,
and that it matters whether there's a trailing slash.
In the old days this didn't happen, the intermediate step was missing,
and so there was more of an argument that "mv symlink/ target" should
ignore the slash. Nowadays, though, isn't that argument weaker?
Second, I just read the POSIX spec and it seems to be a bit buggy
<http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/rename.html>.
The rationale says "Renaming dot or dot-dot is prohibited" but I can't
see anything to that effect in the text itself.
Furthermore, POSIX says that a pathname like "abc/" must be resolved
as if it were "abc/." (see
<http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/xbd_chap04.html#tag_04_11>)
so arguably rename("abc/", "def") must be handled like rename("abc/.",
"def") and if renaming dot or dot-dot is prohibited (which I think it
must be, even if it's omitted inadvertently from the standard) then
this must fail.
There's a similar issue with "rmdir symlink/". It's not clear that
rmdir ("symlink/") should succeed, because pathname resolution
indicates that it should be treated like rmdir ("symlink/.") and this
clearly must fail.
Clearly it's a messy area.
My kneejerk reaction is that I might prefer it if "mv symlink/ foo"
and "rmdir symlink/" always failed, if only because in a confusing
situation like this it's often better to use the Hippocratic rule:
first, do no harm. It would be easy to implement that rule: it
wouldn't require any system calls at all, since we could simply reject
all file names with trailing slashes.
_______________________________________________
Bug-coreutils mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
