> There have been many changes since the last release (unstable 5.3.0). > So many that I feel 5.90 should also be considered unstable, at least > initially.
Minor nit during compilation on cygwin: make[3]: Entering directory `/home/eblake/coreutils-5.90/src' if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I. -I../lib -I../lib -g2 -Wall -MT dd.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/dd.Tpo" -c -o dd.o dd.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/dd.Tpo" ".deps/dd.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/dd.Tpo"; exit 1; fi dd.c: In function `main': dd.c:1661: warning: long unsigned int format, size_t arg (arg 5) As I still haven't been able to convince my employer to sign a copyright disclaimer, there are several patches that are essential for operation on cygwin (such as a replacement to freopen that accepts a NULL first argument) that are not in the official release, but which will appear in the cygwin distribution in the next few days once I make a cygwin distro of coreutils-5.90. Thanks again for all your hard work in maintaining such a diverse, yet essential, group of programs. -- Eric Blake _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
