Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I didn't install this since I figured remove.c might still be > mutating, and I'm not sure what the assert was supposed to check. > > Also, I assumed you wanted to use only declaration-after-statement > C99, not 'for (declaration ...' C99, since only the former is > commonly supported in pre-C99 compilers, but I thought I'd ask to make > sure. > > 2005-11-22 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * src/remove.c (AD_push): Remove assert that doesn't compile. > (rm): Don't assume C99 for (int i = ..., since GCC 4.0.2 rejects > it in default mode.
The latter part is fine. I fixed the first part 40 minutes ago by leaving the assertion there and restoring the decl/defn I mistakenly removed. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
