Frederik Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > +/* This index operation is more efficient on many processors */ > +#define ind(mm, x) \ > + (* (uint32_t *) ((char *) (mm) \ > + + ((x) & (ISAAC_WORDS - 1) * sizeof (uint32_t))))
A compiler that cannot create identical code when using the following definition is not worth being called an optimizing compiler. Broken compilers should be an excuse for obfuscation. #define ind(mm, x) ((mm)[(x) & (ISAAC_WORDS - 1)]) Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
