> > Hmm, I'm not familiar with that resolution. I looked for it in > <http://www.opengroup.org/austin/aardvark/finaltext/xshbug.txt> and > found that XSH Enhancement Request Number 108 talks about the y0() > function. Perhaps you got the number wrong? Or am I looking in the > wrong place?
You are looking at the pre-2004 defects; try looking at the current ones http://www.opengroup.org/austin/aardvark/latest/xshbug2.txt or at my original link in my earlier email, http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-11/msg00301.html http://www.opengroup.org/austin/docs/austin_270.txt I filed it in September after the big debate on this list on the same topic, see the thread here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-09/msg00203.html -- Eric Blake _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
