On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 12:25, Pádraig Brady wrote: > I don't think that fits. > > As I see it, ls is an end user tool, i.e. output > generally goes direct to the end user.
If the output should go asis to end user, than why exists 'ls -I PATTERN' when 'egrep -v PATTERN' could do it later? Isn't it output filtering? Moreno _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
