On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Paul Eggert wrote:
> > What would be the problem when there is an option "--no-dictionary-order"
> > and "--no-ignore-case"?
>
> The problem is implementing those options, not specifying them. I
> don't know how to implement them. If you could supply a patch to
> implement them, that would help.
What about the following solution? It is not exactly implementing the
above options, but nevertheless fixes the problem directly:
--- src/sort.c.bak 2006-01-16 13:34:21.000000000 +0100
+++ src/sort.c 2006-01-16 14:15:14.000000000 +0100
@@ -295,6 +295,7 @@
fputs (_("\
-g, --general-numeric-sort compare according to general numerical
value\n\
-i, --ignore-nonprinting consider only printable characters\n\
+ -l, --no-locale-sort do not sort according to current locale
settings\n\
-M, --month-sort compare (unknown) < `JAN' < ... < `DEC'\n\
-n, --numeric-sort compare according to string numerical
value\n\
-r, --reverse reverse the result of comparisons\n\
@@ -347,7 +348,7 @@
exit (status);
}
-#define COMMON_SHORT_OPTIONS "-bcdfgik:mMno:rsS:t:T:uz"
+#define COMMON_SHORT_OPTIONS "-bcdfgik:lmMno:rsS:t:T:uz"
static struct option const long_options[] =
{
@@ -358,6 +359,7 @@
{"general-numeric-sort", no_argument, NULL, 'g'},
{"ignore-nonprinting", no_argument, NULL, 'i'},
{"key", required_argument, NULL, 'k'},
+ {"no-locale-sort", no_argument, NULL, 'l'},
{"merge", no_argument, NULL, 'm'},
{"month-sort", no_argument, NULL, 'M'},
{"numeric-sort", no_argument, NULL, 'n'},
@@ -2421,6 +2423,13 @@
files[nfiles++] = optarg;
break;
+ case 'l':
+ hard_LC_COLLATE = 0;
+#if HAVE_NL_LANGINFO
+ hard_LC_TIME = 0;
+#endif
+ break;
+
case 'b':
case 'd':
case 'f':
Ciao
--
http://www.dstoecker.de/ (PGP key available)
_______________________________________________
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
