Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > According to Jim Meyering on 1/20/2006 2:38 AM: >> >> Thanks, but won't that also silence a legitimate warning about a mistyped >> value? I'd rather avoid emitting code that discards all stderr output. > > No, my patch does not silence stderr during dircolors, only during the > eval afterwards (after all, it is a warning from tcsh during the eval, and > not from the execution of dircolors, that is annoying). For example, even > with my patch applied:
Ok. Granted that dircolors or tcsh needs to be fixed, I'm reluctant to make such a change to dircolors in order to work around what I see as overly-strict parsing on tcsh's part. Why not invest the effort in fixing tcsh to recognize the new codes, and/or to be more permissive? _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
