Hi, I'm trying to work out what prompted this change:
2003-09-04 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* src/seq.c (step): Default to 1.
(print_numbers): Allow the output to be empty.
(main): The default step is 1, even if LAST < FIRST;
as per documentation.
The original behaviour, of automatically defaulting to -1 when
appropriate, seems on the face of it to be quite useful. I wonder why
the code was changed to match the documentation, rather than the other
way around.
Tim.
*/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
