Pádraig Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote: >> >>>Jim Meyering wrote: >>> >>>>The description of wc's --files0-from is nearly identical >>>>to that of du. I've added an example: >>>>... >>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>+find . -name '*.[ch]' -print0 | ./wc -L --files=- | tail -n1 >>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] example >>> >>>Here you are using the substring abbreviation --files for >>>--files0-from. Which is fine. But what if someday the --files-from >>>option is added? My preference would be to make the example be unique >>>in that case too and to use at least --files0=- there. >> >> ... >> >> Good point. >> I've spelled it out: >> >> * coreutils.texi (wc invocation): Spell out `--files0-from' in >> the example. Suggestion from Bob Proulx. > > s#./wc#wc#
Fixed. Thanks! _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
