Frederik Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > The question is, is there a reason why users wouldn't always want a > "copyFile" function to remove the destination first?
Sometimes, cp --remove-dest will fail, because the destination cannot be removed. Yet cp without that option would be able to update the file, because it's writable. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
