Hi Bruno, Thanks for all of your recent BeOS porting work. We've received very few reports about BeOS problems, other than yours. I'm curious: what's your motivation for using it?
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > After producing this patch, I noticed that the replacement 'statfs' that I > put into stat.c would also be useful for "df -i" (because the f_files, f_ffree > numbers in 'struct statvfs' are only dummies whereas those in 'struct fs_info' > are real ones). > > So, more unification between lib/fsusage.c and src/stat.c seems desirable. > I propose to create a 'struct gnu_statvfs' that contains the usual POSIX > fields plus 'char f_fstypename[]', containing the filesystem name, and a few > minor fields that src/stat.c uses, and to transform the lib/fsusage.c code > into a gnu_statvfs function that could be used by both "df" and "stat". > Does this seem worthwhile? Yes, it does. > Can the SVR2 code (this is the only code in > lib/fsusage.c that makes use of the 'disk' argument) be dropped in the > process? I suspect it is dead, but not knowing, it'd be prudent to add a configure-time AC_MSG_FAILURE message like the one in ftruncate.m4. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
