Frank v Waveren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> unsigned int eons = t.tv_sec >> 31; >> for (i = 0; i < eons; i++) >> sleep for 2**31 seconds; >> t.tv_sec &= 0x7FFFFFFF; > Yeah, I was being lazy. There seems to be a little trouble with the > sleep-as-long-as-we-can patch anyway, I'll see if this isn't too tricky > to hack up and try submitting it.
Thanks. Please let us know how it turns out; if nanosleep can fail with EOVERFLOW we'll have to recode things again to work around that problem. (I hope it doesn't come to that....) _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
