Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> It should also include ENAMETOOLONG: > > Actually, isn't ENAMETOOLONG in the same category as ELOOP? That is, > ENAMETOOLONG sometimes indicates the file isn't there, but sometimes > not. For example, > > rm -f ./././././././.../foo > > (where the "..." stands for lots of "./"s) will fail due to > ENAMETOOLONG, even though the named file actually does exist.
Oh! You're right. I was under the impression that ENAMETOOLONG was only for FILENAME_MAX. But I see now that it's also for PATH_MAX. Thanks. I'll remove that part of my change. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
