Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Peter Breitenlohner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I cannot believe that the new behaviour is intentional, and IMHO it doesn't
>> make much sense.
>
> Looking at the patch that changed the behavior:
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2006-08/msg00285.html
>
> it appears you're right.

This patch did not change the behaviour, it was already present before
that (though implemented in a more roundabout way).  The real change has
sneaked in with revision 1.197 of copy.c.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."


_______________________________________________
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils

Reply via email to