Perry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I sent it to myself as well and I got the attachment. Looking in my > outbox, the attachment is on all three notes.
Very strange. I didn't get the attachment in either of the two emails you sent via the bug-coreutils@gnu.org mailing list. Looking at the mailing list archive (which lags behind realtime by a day or so), the most recently sent attachment <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2006-10/msg00237.html> got expanded inline. Also, lists.gnu.org was down for a few hours recently. Maybe they've changed how they handle attachments, and no longer allow binary ones. That would be bad. I'll CC: this message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to let them know about the problem. The messages we're talking about are <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Received: from [64.192.143.210] (helo=easeserver.easesoftware.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GZpyI-0002KD-C4 for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:31:11 -0400) and <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Received: from [64.192.143.210] (helo=easeserver.easesoftware.com) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GZtOY-0007k6-2f for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:10:30 -0400). In the meantime, can you please send the info to bug-coreutils as plain ASCII text, without attaching it? Thanks. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
