Matthew Woehlke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ack, I must apologize for giving wrong information. What I meant to > say is that there is no /sync/ (oddly enough, there is fsync on > NSK). So building 'sync' is silly
Not really. Shell scripts use 'sync'. Even if it's a noop it's nice to have. Google code says several other programs test for HAVE_FSYNC (e.g., glimpse, ruby) so I still think the patch is reasonable, even though I don't know which systems lack fsync. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
