Evan Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Just like you can ignore a .1 in the start spec. But you can't ignore a >> .0 in a start spec, because it is wrong. You can't denote the _end_ of >> the start field. > > Very well. In that case, let's edit the documentation to reflect that .0 > represents the end of the field, and I'll be happy.
I would welcome a patch (to coreutils.texi) to do that. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
