Dan Hipschman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>   %   cumulative   self              self     total
>  time   seconds   seconds    calls   s/call   s/call  name
>  47.91      4.92     4.92     9269     0.00     0.00  find_temp

Yes, thanks, that explains the results all right....

> without the -S flag, even the largest file on my hard drive (~80M)
> didn't use any temp files so I had to resort to this artificial
> approach.

For a more realistic test, we need to sort something larger, so that
'sort' becomes disk-bound.  Maybe a terabyte of data or so, for a
typically small machine nowadays that has a GB or two of RAM?

It will be a bit of a pain to arrange for a decent set of test cases
here, but without it I'm afraid we're just guessing about what will
make things run faster oversll.


_______________________________________________
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils

Reply via email to