On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Jim Meyering wrote:
I had to use "seq -f %.0f" to get this filesize.
Odd.
Here's what those generate for me:
$ seq 9999999 > k
$ wc -c < k
78888888
$ tail -1 k
9999999
What happens differently for you?
$ seq 9999990 9999999
9.99999e+06
9.99999e+06
9.99999e+06
9.99999e+06
9.99999e+06
1e+07
1e+07
1e+07
1e+07
1e+07
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ seq --version
seq (GNU coreutils) 5.93
I'm using an old version of seq with a different default format (I
didn't realised it had changed recently.)
Cheers,
Phil
_______________________________________________
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
