Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Last night I made another coreutils snapshot:
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.7-dirty.tar.gz
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.7-dirty.tar.gz.sig
aka
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.7-ss-2007-02-14.00:04:10+0.tar.gz
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.7-ss-2007-02-14.00:04:10+0.tar.gz.sig
If you take the time to build/test, it'd be nice to let me or the list
know, even if it's just to say that everything went fine. [snip]
I'm going to give AIX another run, since I ran into problems last time.
After jumping through hoops to get configure to use -qlanglvl=extc99
(people don't want me creating a /usr/include/stdbool.h and xlc doesn't
seem to pay attention to INCLUDE, I finally had to explicitly use
CFLAGS=-I<path-to-stdbool.h>), it built clean, which is an improvement
over last time when as you'll recall I had problems with the strstr
declaration. I'll be pleasantly surprised if it passes 'make check'
cleanly, as that tends to hit false positives and/or kernel bugs, but
it's looking good!
Thanks again for the snapshots. :-)
--
Matthew
Patches Thoughtfully Considered -- FLOSS mantra
_______________________________________________
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
