Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The problem here is the NFS *client*, isn't it? And I'm not sure this > is really a bug of the NFS client, knowing the fact that NFS works > asynchronously.
No, you're right, I don't see a bug in the GNU/Linux NFS client here. The original workaround has to do with Mac OS X; see http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2006-09/msg00359.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2006-09/msg00368.html and it's the workaround that is running afoul of the GNU/Linux NFS client. If we could get rid of the workaround somehow, we wouldn't have a problem on GNU/Linux NFS. (But I guess we would have a problem on buggy MacOS platforms, either NFS client or NFS server I guess, though I don't know the details.) _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
