[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes: > Would it hard for date -d to accept YYYYMMDD.HHMM as well as > YYYYMMDD HHMM? I often use the period, since then it's a number that > can at least be compared ...
It could be done, but it wouldn't be trivial, as the lexer currently treats YYYYMMDD.HHMM as a count of seconds to the nearest 10,000th of a second. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
