Evan Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That makes sense, but maybe we could bring back the former behavior > as an option, i.e. "nohup --keeptty" or some such? It seems useful.
An option might make sense, but why is it useful? Often the hardest part about adding such an option is writing the documentation for it, so I guess I'm asking what would appear in the documentation if we added such an option. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
