"James Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/23/07, Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The fact that you mailed the obsolete bug-fileutils list implies that you >> may be due for an upgrade. fileutils merged into coreutils, and the >> latest stable version is now 6.9. > > Is it time perhaps to automate responses for the various obsolete lists?
That would be great, if there is a way to ensure that the responses go only to legitimate senders. I've just updated the file (only in git/cvs), README-package-renamed-to-coreutils, with a few more URLS: ------------------------------------------ As of 2002-09-01, the GNU fileutils, textutils, and sh-utils packages have been merged into one, called the GNU coreutils. See http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/ for a description. Here's the FAQ list: http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/ For information on the mailing lists associated with the coreutils package, see these: http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/coreutils-announce http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils mailing list archives are here: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.coreutils.announce http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.core-utils.bugs (up to the minute) http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-coreutils/ (updated every 12 hours) _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
