Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Like Jim, I'm not sold about adding an option to nohup when simple I/O > redirection already works. However, I think it'd be nice to document > the I/O redirection. Here's a proposed patch. > > [ChangeLog] > * src/nohup.c (usage): Describe how standard input and output > are redirected. > [doc/ChangeLog] > * coreutils.texi (nohup invocation): Add advice about saving > output to a file.
Thanks. I applied those changes. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
