On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 03:04:33PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Genparse looks promising. > > I like the examples. But there are almost 100 programs in the > > coreutils. If genparse can really handle all of those use cases > > without causing any significant degradation in the tools, then > > it will be hard to object. > > There's also argp, which is part of glibc and also provided by gnulib.
I would expect Genparse to generate faster code than argp because it does part of the work at compile time while argp does everything at run time since it's a library function. > Andreas. > > -- > Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany > PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 > "And now for something completely different." _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
