Bob Proulx scripsit: > > My request is: could the output be preceded by > > 1) the name/PID of the process that produces the output. > > 2) the time that the output was produced. > > I don't think that is possible without an active participation by a > process.
Indeed, I don't see how it's possible at all. If nohup were to run its program using a pipe to intercept standard output and error, it wouldn't be able to tell child output from grandchild output. Data in a pipe is not tagged with its originator in any way. -- In politics, obedience and support John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> are the same thing. --Hannah Arendt http://www.ccil.org/~cowan _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
