-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 According to Eric Blake on 6/19/2007 9:12 PM: > Thanks for the report, but it is too spotty to act on. What is LS_COLORS > set to in these circumstances? Are you competing with any aliases for ls? > Also, which systems claim to support d_ino reliably? And what are the > characteristics of 'test' (for example, is it executable)? I suspect that > the difference here is whether or not ls had to do a stat, and whether or > not the d_ino was reliable when ls decided not to do a stat.
Make that d_type, not d_ino. - -- Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well! Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGeJ1t84KuGfSFAYARAiSsAKCijZcbFdxB0ETqJ+fjFRmQxg7qwgCgrtWI wCmMYnteDkRhBwXHFVlBO1s= =UuF/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
