-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 According to Eric Blake on 8/29/2007 5:47 PM: > We should consider editing both of these interpretations to also apply to > ln. The coreutils list noted, just this month, that > 'ln a/f b/f c && rm -Rf a b' > risks losing user data;
That example should have read: 'ln -f a/f b/f c && rm -Rf a b' - -- Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well! Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG1g9e84KuGfSFAYARAiSIAJ9KlxCvA3bJEQrklAR+LGTLwCUttACgvI8R KooGPUK41dCjmhApjepE/CI= =5Nbi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
