Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for incorporating mktemp into Coreutils. We're currently > using a patch in Linux From Scratch that installs a `tempfile' wrapper > script, for those packages still out in the wild that call `tempfile' > rather than `mktemp'. Would such a wrapper, or similar functionality > be of interest for Coreutils?
Hi Matt, Thanks for the offer, but no. Including something like that in coreutils might actually encourage use of tempfile, and I'd rather discourage that. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils