Hello Jim, all,
found a single typo in the coreutils manual. Also, I suggest to change
`relationals' as it seemed a bit odd -- is that a proper word? Even if
it is, I think `relational operators' is clearer, at least to a
non-native like me.
Cheers,
Ralf
2007-12-21 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* doc/coreutils.texi: Fix a typo. Avoid the term `relationals'.
diff --git a/doc/coreutils.texi b/doc/coreutils.texi
index 392359b..01c2edb 100644
--- a/doc/coreutils.texi
+++ b/doc/coreutils.texi
@@ -7079,7 +7079,7 @@ Preserve the times of last access and last modification,
when possible.
In general, it is not possible to preserve these attributes
when the affected file is a symbolic link.
However, FreeBSD now provides the @code{lutimes} function, which makes
-it possibile even for symbolic links. However, this implementation does
+it possible even for symbolic links. However, this implementation does
not yet take advantage of that.
@c FIXME: once we provide lutimes support, update the above.
@itemx links
@@ -10687,9 +10687,9 @@ True if the strings are not equal.
@cindex numeric tests
@cindex arithmetic tests
-Numeric relationals. The arguments must be entirely numeric (possibly
-negative), or the special expression @[EMAIL PROTECTED] @var{string}}}, which
-evaluates to the length of @var{string}.
+Numeric relational operators. The arguments must be entirely numeric
+(possibly negative), or the special expression @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
@var{string}}},
+which evaluates to the length of @var{string}.
@table @samp
_______________________________________________
Bug-coreutils mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
