Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is it worth trying to re-merge these two approaches, since they forked > from a common ancestor?
I think that was always the intent. I tried to merge them a while back but lacked the time to get it right. > We'd have to figure out how to choose between the names > maint.mk vs. Makefile.maint. Let's just pick one. I vote for 'maint.mk' as the '.mk' extension for makefiles is more-logical. > And since GNUmakefile is placed in build-aux > by gnulib-tool, each package that uses it would need to either use > bootstrap to move it to the top-level directory, or commit a symlink in > the top-level directory that points to where gnulib-tool will dump it in > build-aux. How about if we fix gnulib-tool to do the symlink, or the move? It seems strange that this work would have to be re-done by each bootstrap procedure. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
