Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> As for i18n, some students nearly took on the project of implementing a >> palatable solution recently, but that's been deferred for a few months. > > Interesting... In 2001 you set out the following requirements for such > a solution: > - Processing in unibyte locales should not become significantly slower > than before. > - Code duplication should be avoided, for maintainability. > - Macros which expand to one thing in the multibyte case and to another > thing for the unibyte case are not acceptable. > > How will this students' project solve this dilemma?
There's no guarantee, but Paul and I will be supervising. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
