Elbert Pol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
>> Remember when you chose not to run "make -k check"? ;-)
>> Well, now would be a good time to go back and do that,
>> but with working tools in your PATH, of course.
>>
> Hoi Jim,
>
> As you told before this fails :(
> I attach check.log

Try again, but this time be sure to use -k, as suggested above.
Then it won't stop at the first failure.


_______________________________________________
Bug-coreutils mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils

Reply via email to