Jim Meyering wrote: > Thank you for reviving that thread. Actually, I never did fix it. > I remember looking at it, and finding that any fix would be more > than a little invasive. So, while the value of the fix is obvious, > there was also the matter of risk to the rest of the code, time to > write and test the patch, including the obligatory test suite additions, > so I added it to the TODO list:
No worries. I had actually dug into the source a bit myself, to see if it'd be a trivial fix, and for similar reasons, that's why I just attached this report instead of report plus patch. :) Thanks again! -CJ _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
