Bo Borgerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> Also, I made some syntactic changes to fit with my policy >> preferences (no ">" operators, and adjusted "const" placement): > > Thanks Jim. > > BTW - Do you have these policy preferences collected somewhere? I don't > remember seeing some of them in the general GNU standards document. > If they are coreutils-specific would it make sense to have a section in > HACKING (or maybe a dedicated standards.txt supplement) to explain them?
Those two are my own preferences. Yes, mentioning them in HACKING is on my list. I prefer < to >, and caught the bug from Paul. I'm not alone: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/3903/focus=4126 I'll dig up justification for my const placement preference later. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
