Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Kamil Dudka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> On Wednesday 03 September 2008 11:03:22 you wrote: >>>> Kamil Dudka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>> Since both arguments are already bool I see no need for LOG_EQ (it's the >>>> only use anyway). >>> If you are using type bool, there is no guarantee there will be bool (0/1) >>> value inside. >> >> RTFS. It _is_ guaranteed. Even if bool != C99 _Bool. > > In general, when using gnulib's replacement via stdbool.in.h, > the following comment from that file is relevant:
It's not relevant here. The source already depends on the current guarantee for pure bool values. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
